C

Cadence Design Systems

Develops EDA software, IP, verification tools

Information Security Architect - Endpoint Security, Endpoint Detection and Response / Extended Detection and Response

Full-TimePosted on 10/22/2026
$168k - $312k/yr+ Bonus + Equity + 401(k) Match
Senior, Expert
San Jose, CA, USA
In Person
CybersecuritySecurity Engineering & Architecture

About the job

Requirements
  • At least 8 years of experience in Information Security, Cybersecurity Engineering, Security Architecture, Endpoint Security, Security Operations, or a related field.
  • Demonstrated experience designing and architecting enterprise endpoint security solutions at scale.
  • Deep hands-on and architectural experience with EDR and/or XDR technologies.
  • Experience architecting and governing EDR/XDR environments across thousands of endpoints.
  • Strong understanding of endpoint security architecture across Windows, Linux, and macOS.
  • Strong understanding of endpoint attack techniques, malware behavior, persistence, privilege escalation, lateral movement, command execution, and common attacker techniques.
  • Strong experience with EDR/XDR detection, threat hunting, incident response, remediation, and endpoint isolation.
  • Experience developing enterprise security standards, architecture patterns, technical baselines, and security controls.
  • Strong understanding of enterprise networking fundamentals including TCP/IP, DNS, HTTP/HTTPS, TLS, proxies, firewalls, and common security protocols.
  • Experience designing integrations between EDR/XDR platforms and SIEM, SOAR, ITSM, vulnerability management, identity, and other security technologies.
  • Strong understanding of security architecture principles, defense-in-depth, Zero Trust, least privilege, and risk-based security design.
  • Experience with scripting and automation using PowerShell, Python, Bash, or similar technologies.
  • Ability to operate effectively in a large, complex enterprise environment with multiple technology and infrastructure organizations.
Responsibilities
  • Define and own the enterprise endpoint security architecture and technical strategy across Windows, Linux, and macOS environments.
  • Develop and maintain the strategic roadmap for EDR, XDR, endpoint protection, endpoint detection, threat prevention, and response capabilities.
  • Establish enterprise endpoint security architecture principles, standards, reference architectures, and technology patterns.
  • Architect and govern EDR/XDR solutions for large-scale, geographically distributed, and heterogeneous enterprise environments.
  • Define security architecture requirements for endpoint protection, detection, telemetry, prevention, isolation, remediation, and threat hunting.
  • Evaluate current-state endpoint security capabilities and develop target-state architectures and transformation roadmaps.
  • Assess and recommend EDR/XDR technologies based on security effectiveness, scalability, operational impact, integration capabilities, and total cost of ownership.
  • Define architectural requirements for endpoint security integrations with SIEM, SOAR, IAM, vulnerability management, ITSM, cloud security, network security, and other enterprise security platforms.
  • Establish architecture patterns for onboarding new business units, platforms, cloud workloads, and acquired environments into the enterprise endpoint security ecosystem.
  • Ensure endpoint security architecture supports Zero Trust and defense-in-depth security strategies.
  • Develop technology-agnostic security requirements and evaluation criteria for EDR/XDR platforms.
  • Serve as the senior technical authority and architecture subject-matter expert for the enterprise EDR/XDR capability.
  • Define the architecture, deployment model, organizational structure, policy hierarchy, and security control framework for EDR/XDR platforms.
  • Establish enterprise standards for EDR/XDR policies, exclusions, application controls, agent configurations, security controls, and endpoint segmentation.
  • Define architectural approaches for endpoint coverage, agent health, telemetry collection, detection, response, and centralized management.
  • Develop scalable designs for EDR/XDR across thousands of enterprise endpoints and diverse operating-system environments.
  • Establish architecture and governance standards for agent lifecycle management, upgrades, configuration changes, and platform enhancements.
  • Design integration patterns between EDR/XDR platforms and enterprise SIEM, SOAR, SOC, ticketing, vulnerability management, identity, and cloud security platforms.
  • Evaluate and guide capabilities such as endpoint telemetry, behavioral detection, threat hunting, automated response, remediation, isolation, rollback, and forensic investigation.
  • Provide architectural guidance for managed detection and response capabilities where applicable.
  • Review and approve significant EDR/XDR configuration, architecture, and policy changes from an architecture and security-risk perspective.
  • Ensure EDR/XDR solutions are implemented consistently while allowing appropriate flexibility for different business, technology, and risk requirements.
  • Define endpoint detection and response architecture aligned with current threat intelligence and adversary behaviors.
  • Develop enterprise detection and response strategies mapped to frameworks such as MITRE ATT&CK.
  • Establish architectural requirements for endpoint telemetry, behavioral detection, process monitoring, command-line visibility, network activity, and endpoint threat intelligence.
  • Partner with Security Operations and Incident Response teams to improve endpoint detection and response capabilities.
  • Provide architecture guidance for threat hunting and advanced endpoint investigation.
  • Analyze emerging attack techniques, malware trends, persistence mechanisms, lateral movement techniques, and endpoint-based attack vectors.
  • Define security controls to detect and mitigate common endpoint attack techniques.
  • Define requirements for automated and analyst-driven endpoint containment and remediation.
  • Participate in complex security investigations and provide architectural guidance during major incidents.
  • Conduct post-incident architecture reviews and recommend improvements to endpoint security controls.
  • Define enterprise endpoint security baselines and technical security standards.
  • Establish hardened endpoint configuration requirements and security control frameworks.
  • Develop reference architectures for Windows, Linux, and macOS endpoint security.
  • Define security requirements for endpoint management technologies including Intune, SCCM/MECM, Jamf, Ansible, and similar platforms.
  • Partner with endpoint engineering teams to incorporate security controls into endpoint build and deployment processes.
  • Provide architecture guidance for vulnerability management, endpoint hardening, application control, and attack-surface reduction.
  • Define security requirements for endpoint provisioning, configuration, lifecycle management, and decommissioning.
  • Establish technical standards for endpoint security exceptions, exclusions, risk acceptance, and compensating controls.
  • Ensure endpoint security architecture supports CIS benchmarks, organizational security standards, audit requirements, and regulatory obligations.
  • Review proposed infrastructure and technology changes for endpoint security implications.
  • Partner with enterprise and solution architects to ensure endpoint security is integrated into the broader enterprise security architecture.
  • Define security architecture requirements for integrations between endpoint, identity, network, cloud, application, and security operations platforms.
  • Develop security architecture diagrams, data-flow diagrams, reference designs, and technical standards.
  • Evaluate security implications of new technologies, applications, infrastructure platforms, and cloud services.
  • Ensure endpoint security telemetry and controls integrate effectively with enterprise security monitoring and analytics platforms.
  • Define requirements for security automation and orchestration to improve detection, response, and operational efficiency.
  • Partner with SOC and security engineering teams to identify opportunities for automation and workflow optimization.
  • Establish endpoint security architecture governance, standards, and control requirements.
  • Participate in architecture review boards and technology governance processes.
  • Assess endpoint security risks and recommend appropriate technical controls and mitigating architectures.
  • Review security exceptions and provide risk-based recommendations.
  • Support internal and external audits by providing endpoint security architecture, standards, and control documentation.
  • Ensure endpoint security designs align with applicable regulatory, compliance, and organizational requirements.
  • Define metrics and key performance indicators for endpoint security architecture, coverage, control effectiveness, and risk reduction.
  • Develop executive-level reporting on endpoint security posture, architecture maturity, and strategic initiatives.
  • Provide security architecture leadership for mergers, acquisitions, divestitures, and major technology transformations.
  • Define architecture and migration strategies for integrating acquired environments into the enterprise endpoint security ecosystem.
  • Assess security architectures, endpoint technologies, EDR/XDR platforms, policies, and security controls within acquired environments.
  • Develop transition roadmaps to standardize endpoint security capabilities across newly integrated organizations.
  • Identify architectural gaps, security risks, technical debt, and integration challenges.
  • Lead or provide technical oversight for large-scale endpoint security transformation initiatives.
  • Serve as a senior technical advisor and subject-matter expert for endpoint security and EDR/XDR.
  • Provide technical leadership and architectural direction to security engineers and infrastructure teams.
  • Collaborate with SOC, Incident Response, Network Security, Cloud Security, Identity, Infrastructure, IT, and Application teams.
  • Translate complex security requirements into practical and scalable technical architectures.
  • Mentor engineers and security professionals on endpoint security architecture, EDR/XDR, threat detection, and incident response.
  • Lead technical discussions with security technology vendors and service providers.
  • Conduct architecture reviews, proof-of-concepts, technical evaluations, and design workshops.
  • Communicate complex technical risks and architecture decisions effectively to technical and executive audiences.
Desired Qualifications
  • Experience with multiple leading EDR/XDR platforms and technologies.
  • Experience evaluating, selecting, and migrating between EDR/XDR platforms.
  • Experience integrating EDR/XDR technologies with SIEM, SOAR, MDR, ITSM, identity, vulnerability management, and cloud security platforms.
  • Experience with Microsoft security technologies including Microsoft Defender, Entra ID, Intune, Microsoft 365 Defender, and related security services.
  • Experience with enterprise EDR/XDR platforms such as SentinelOne, CrowdStrike, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Palo Alto Cortex XDR, or similar technologies.
  • Experience architecting security solutions in Azure and/or AWS.
  • Strong knowledge of the MITRE ATT&CK framework and adversary techniques.
  • Experience with vulnerability management platforms such as Tenable.
  • Experience with CIS benchmarks, endpoint hardening, security baselines, and compliance frameworks.
  • Experience with enterprise endpoint management platforms including SCCM/MECM, Intune, Jamf, Ansible, or similar technologies.
  • Experience with Zero Trust architecture and endpoint security modernization.
  • Experience leading endpoint security architecture assessments and technology evaluations.
  • Experience supporting mergers, acquisitions, divestitures, and enterprise technology integrations.
  • Security architecture certifications such as CISSP, SABSA, CCSP, or GIAC.

About the company

Cadence Design Systems provides software, hardware, and IP for electronic design automation (EDA) to help customers design advanced semiconductor chips and electronic systems. Its tools cover system-level design and verification, digital and analog IC design, and custom design flows, with IP offerings like Tensilica processors and DSP cores available for licensing. It differentiates itself by offering an end-to-end EDA portfolio and deep collaboration with industry leaders across implementation, verification, and IP. The goal is to help customers bring sophisticated silicon and electronics to market faster while reducing risk and improving productivity across AI, audio, video, and automotive applications.

Company Size

10,001+

Company Stage

IPO

Headquarters

San Jose, California

Founded

1988

Get referred to Cadence Design Systems

See people who can refer or advise you

Simplify Jobs

Simplify's Take

What believers are saying

  • Q2 2026 revenue rose 24% to $1.584 billion, lifting full-year guidance.
  • Intel and Honda validated Cadence’s AI and IP products with fresh design wins.
  • SPDRM 2026.2.3 boosted concurrency 50%, strengthening Cadence’s enterprise workflow moat.

What critics are saying

  • Cadence sued Suzhou Tianzhun in August 2026 over cracked software and copyright infringement.
  • Cadence trades above 15 times revenue; any AI demand slowdown can compress multiples fast.
  • Synopsys’ Ansys bundle threatens Cadence’s pricing power in verification, IP, and system design.

What makes Cadence Design Systems unique

  • Cadence’s 2026 ChipStack agents automate spec-to-RTL, verification, and PPA optimization.
  • Cadence’s PCIe 6.0 subsystem passed July 2026 compliance first-pass on TSMC N3.
  • Cadence’s July 2026 backlog hit $8.1 billion, showing entrenched design-in lock-in.

Help us improve and share your feedback! Did you find this helpful?

Benefits

  • Health Insurance
  • Dental Insurance
  • Life Insurance
  • Flexible Work Hours
  • Paid Vacation
  • Paid Sick Leave

Growth & Insights and Company News

6 month growth

1%

1 year growth

-1%

2 year growth

-1%
Yahoo Finance
Oct 20th, 2026
Cadence stock up 105.2% in five years while typical software peer fell 48.2%

Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) shares rose 105.2% in the five years to October 19, 2026, beating 119 of 125 companies in the application software industry. The typical company in that industry fell 48.2%, so the industry did not carry the stock. The S&P 500 gained 70.2% over the period. The typical information technology company fell 23.9%. Earnings per share rose 107.0%, closely tracking the share price. Revenue grew an average of 15.5% a year over three years, against 11.1% for the typical peer. Management raised its fiscal 2026 revenue growth guidance to 19%. Fiscal third-quarter results are expected on or around October 26, 2026.

Yahoo Finance
Oct 14th, 2026
Cadence stock rose 13x in a decade to $129,800, but fell 20% or more seven times

A $10,000 investment in Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) stock grew to about $129,800 over the past ten years, before dividends. The same sum in the S&P 500 reached about $36,500. Holding it was hard. The stock fell 20% or more from a closing high seven times, and three of those drops reached 30% or more. The latest fall was the deepest. Shares dropped 34% from early June to mid-September 2026, while the S&P 500 slipped 0.3%. The business held up. Twelve-month revenue rose 5.6% over that span, and operating margin stayed near 31%. The stock has since risen 22% from its September low but remains about 20% below its June high.

Yahoo Finance
Oct 2nd, 2026
Fair Isaac faces mortgage score challenge while Cadence grows across all products

Fair Isaac and Cadence Design Systems both sell products customers cannot easily replace, but their growth drivers differ significantly. Cadence's chip design software grows across all product groups, whilst Fair Isaac's growth stems primarily from raising prices on its FICO Score. In September 2026, the Federal Housing Finance Agency announced it would start using VantageScore, a cheaper rival, to set mortgage prices. This decision particularly affects Fair Isaac, whose Scores revenue grew 41% in fiscal Q3 2026, driven mainly by higher mortgage score prices. Cadence carries far less debt, at 2.7% of market value versus Fair Isaac's 40%. Fair Isaac trades at 18.4 times earnings compared to Cadence's 69.7 times. Fair Isaac's share price has fallen 56% over the past year, whilst Cadence is down 0.2%. Fair Isaac has not reported results since the government announcement.

Yahoo Finance
Oct 1st, 2026
Synopsys vs Cadence: Which chip design software giant offers better value after Ansys acquisition?

Synopsys and Cadence Design Systems dominate the chip design software market, yet both stocks have fallen over the past year despite strong semiconductor sector performance. Synopsys generated $9.42 billion in revenue, growing 42.4% last quarter largely through its Ansys acquisition. However, the deal brought significant costs: operating margin sits at 14.52%, total debt reached $10.84 billion, and return on equity fell to 3.66%. Cadence achieved 24.2% organic revenue growth to $5.84 billion without major acquisitions. It maintains a 28.58% operating margin and carries just $2.65 billion in debt. The valuation gap reflects these differences. Cadence trades at over 15 times revenue versus Synopsys's 8.5 times. On trailing earnings, Synopsys appears more expensive at 73 times versus 65 times for Cadence. Both companies benefit from customer lock-in, as switching design tools requires costly revalidation and retraining. AI chip designers have strengthened demand for both vendors. At Q2 2026, 85 hedge funds held Synopsys shares worth $4.1 billion, whilst 69 held Cadence positions valued at $3.2 billion.

Cadence
Sep 29th, 2026
Cadence BETA CAE announces the release of 2025.2.3 version of its software suite.

Cadence BETA CAE announces the release of 2025.2.3 version of its software suite. About this release. Cadence Design Systems, Inc. officially announce the third hot fix release of 2025.2 for the Cadence BETA CAE ANSA Pre-Processor, EPILYSIS FEA Solver, META Post-Processor, FATIQ Platform, SPDRM Software and KOMVOS SDM Console with critical bug fixes. Known Issues Resolved in ANSA Pre-Processor. Focusing on "Isolate flanges proximity" functionality, unmeshed faces thickness would wrongly be disregarded, and solid thickness value would be used instead. Batch Meshing Certain CFD anisotropic mesh cases could occasionally lead to an unexpected termination when setup was taking place via ANSA Parameters. Volume Meshing Abrupt changes in layer heights could occur in corners where layers would connect to inclined sides. Connections and Assembly Realizing a Y-JOINT-SHELL with 'Preserve mesh' options could produce wrong results. In addition, after executing 'Erase FE' of a SPIDER2 connection realized on the 'Top Area' of a stamp feature, the elements filling the hole would be added to the 'Rest Area' of the stamp feature, causing a subsequent realize action to fail. Compare Tool Opening the 'Compare Tool' unexpectedly would cause tabbed 'Models List' to disappear. Decks - General Unexpected software abortion would also take place when using the '[STRIKEOUT:>' syntax to get the ID of a material used in a material reference field in a PART_COMPOSITE property list (i.e. MID1]>MID). Focusing on material DB and "Copy to List" command, the unmatched materials would wrongly get other IDs, while no overlap would exist. The calculation of the resultant force would be incorrect when the 'Resultant Force' tool was applied to DLOADs with load type Hydrostatic Pressure (HP) and the 'Magnitude > Loads' option was deactivated in the presentation parameters. The 'Compress' function would wrongly delete DEFINE_BOX entities ignoring the fact that they were used in the model. A contact entity consisting of a flex body and a rigid body having several geometries would erroneously be exported as several contact definitions with the same name and that would create a conflict in ADAMS. Focusing on flex bodies, while exporting models in ADAMS Solver Dataset (.adm) format, the .mtx data of flex bodies would not be written out on Windows O/S. Optimization In the 'Optimization' tool, the functions 'RSM Improve' and 'RSM Optimization' would occasionally not recognize the ML toolkit environment. Also, the 'Optimization' tool would falsely output integer design variable values (e.g. MID, PID) as float type, when symbolic variables option was activated. Focusing on OptiStruct, DTPG card would not be correctly output as expected. Task Manager ANSA Pre-Processor would terminate unexpectedly when long comments were added to the task manager. Known Issues Resolved in META Post-Processor Focusing on 2D plots, META Post-Processor would abort when double-clicking the X-coordinate of a curve point created by 'Bore Distortion Analysis.' In addition, unexpected termination could occur when deleting META variables. Curves from .h5 files were not read properly. Abaqus fastener coupling visibility actions were not working as expected. Results on transformed includes were not displayed correctly on the corresponding transformed geometry. Also, thickness and MID information were neither read, nor displayed properly in META Post-Processor. Math Operations on Field Data Calculations with tensor results for 'Strain Gauges' would not take large translations/rotations into account. Project Files and METADB Script function 'results.PrimaryResultsList' would not return the correct information for METADBs converted from d3plot. Images and Video Handling Scale points for 'Plot Tracked Features' could not be picked on the video and the model. Read Results When loading a curve from a column ASCII format file using the 'Bar Plot from Column' or 'Bar Plot from Row' format options, the corresponding command recorded in the session was not automatically recognized as a valid filename. META Post-Processor would freeze when selecting a results file through file path recommendations using only the keyboard. META Post-Processor was unable to recognize distinct subcases in H3D files during result selection. Managing Curve Data META Post-Processor would terminate unexpectedly in cases of binout files with rbdout section. Wrong vector fringe would be generated in Internal type boundaries of Fidelity Flow cases. Annotations Annotations on selection variables were not properly evaluated if 'Append Pointers' option was active. Also, creating annotations on picked entities from screen could possibly lead to abnormal termination. Pressing Ctrl+N following export to JT format would lead to an unexpected termination. Regarding Spreadsheet Editor, extending LOG10 function to several cells led to corruption of the function. The same corrupted behavior was noticed while loading XLSX spreadsheet with extended LOG10 formulas. In addition, when saving a property's HTML Laminate Report, the report was saved without the associated images in the output folder. Known Issues Resolved in FATIQ Platform Calculations - Deterministic Loads Multiple subcases in deterministic loads would not be handled properly. Known Issues Resolved in KOMVOS SDM Console The KOMVOS SDM Console profile name would not be updated in the main panel upon reconnecting to SPDRM Software. Data Management - Lifecycle Business Rules The evaluation of conflict resolution policy through API now operates as expected. Known Issues Resolved in SPDRM Software Performance This release introduces significant enhancements to the SPDRM Software server, boosting its ability to handle high concurrency and demanding workloads. Key improvements include: * Enhanced stability: Advanced mechanisms ensure consistent and reliable operation, even under extreme load conditions. * Greater resilience: Optimized handling of concurrent requests maintains responsiveness during peak demand. The efficiency in processing rapid concurrent uploads, queries and exports has increased by 50%. Furthermore, the new release showcases efficient resource utilization, optimized I/O handling, and robust concurrency control, which are the key factors for scaling distributed systems, specifically: * 40,000+ structured CAE objects (metadata and file) saved in 15 minutes * 350 concurrent workers executing read/write operations with consistent throughput * This stress test scenario is equivalent to and ensures that 1,000+ active users can effectively perform daily business tasks connected to SPDRM Software Where to Download From You can find this release on Cadence Downloads, dated as of September 22, 2026. Customers who are served by a local business agent should contact the local support channel for software distribution details. Visit Cadence Softwae Downloads.