Growth Manager

Proton Pass 1.39.0 released. Published 3 hours ago by Kalyx Tib Veenor Proton Pass has released version 1.39.0 of its open-source password and identity manager, which is designed to securely manage logins, two-factor authentication (2FA) codes, email aliases, secure notes, and files, all protected by end-to-end encryption. Developed by Proton AG in Switzerland, Proton Pass distinguishes itself from typical password managers by offering built-in email aliasing, allowing users to create disposable email addresses for various online services. This feature enhances privacy by mitigating the risks associated with data breaches. In terms of daily usability, Proton Pass excels with its straightforward functionality, efficiently autofilling logins and enabling quick syncing across devices, provided users log into their Proton accounts. Key features include comprehensive data encryption - including URLs and metadata, integrated email aliasing, a built-in 2FA authenticator, and flexible storage options for various sensitive items. Additionally, users can securely share passwords and notes with others, including those who do not use Proton. However, the platform has some limitations. While the free version is robust, it lacks advanced features like dark-web alerts and in-depth security checks unless users opt for a paid plan. Support is primarily through email and a knowledge base, with no live customer assistance available. Moreover, while the pricing is reasonable, it may not be the most budget-friendly option for all users. In summary, Proton Pass is a privacy-focused password manager that offers strong security features and useful tools like email aliasing and integrated 2FA. It provides a compelling alternative for those seeking to enhance their online security without compromising on usability. Users considering a switch from their current password manager may find Proton Pass's unique features and strong encryption model appealing, despite some drawbacks in convenience and support. In extending the discussion, it's worth noting the growing importance of digital privacy and security in today's online landscape. As cyber threats become more sophisticated, tools like Proton Pass not only serve basic password management needs but also empower users to take proactive steps in safeguarding their personal information. Additionally, as more individuals and organizations recognize the significance of end-to-end encryption, the demand for privacy-centric solutions is likely to increase, positioning Proton Pass as a valuable resource in the evolving realm of digital security

Privacy giant Proton may be building a web browser - but its community turns cold. August 11, 2026 * Proton is seeking a software engineer to help build a "privacy-first browser" * News that it may be based on Google's Chromium disappoints some users * Early community reaction has been surprisingly hostile overall For many users, the quest to cut Google out of your digital life starts with switching to privacy-first alternatives. Swiss tech firm Proton, famous for its secure email platform and one of the best VPN services on the market, has been leading that charge. Now, it looks like the company might be preparing to take aim at Google Chrome. According to a newly discovered job listing - first reported by TechCentral.ie - Proton is actively recruiting a software engineer to help build a web browser. The application explicitly mentions joining a "browser product team" based in Geneva or Zurich. While a dedicated browser might seem like a natural next step for Proton's expanding security-first ecosystem, the initial reaction from its most loyal users has been largely negative. TechRadar approached Proton for comments, but the company declined to comment. A Chromium fork or an exploratory project? The job spec leaves little doubt about the technical foundations of the project. Proton is seeking candidates with "hands-on experience building or maintaining a Chromium-based browser." The successful engineer will be tasked with implementing "anti-fingerprinting measures, content blocking, or reducing telemetry and third-party dependencies." They will also collaborate to build a "privacy-first internet browser used by millions around the world" across macOS, Windows, and Linux. Despite these concrete details, it's important not to exaggerate the evidence. Much like when Proton Mail landed on desktop, complex software development takes time. A single job listing indicates that Proton is experimenting with a browser, but the project could easily remain an internal test for years, or be scrapped altogether before seeing the light of day. The evidence suggests the company is only just exploring the concept, in fact, with no official plans to ship a finished product anytime soon. So, if you're eager to ditch Google browsing for a secure alternative made by Proton specifically, you might need to wait. Why are Proton users unhappy? Usually, the announcement of a new privacy tool is met with excitement, but the response on Reddit has been decidedly hostile. The backlash stems from two main issues: the choice of browser engine and the company's current product roadmap. First, privacy-conscious users are frustrated by the reliance on Chromium, the open-source codebase maintained by Google. As one user pointed out, releasing another Chromium-based browser is "indirectly driving us deeper into a monopoly." Many fans argued that Proton should instead build a Firefox fork or focus its resources on Ladybird, an independent browser project that Proton already officially sponsors. Second, users feel that Proton is spreading its development resources too thin. Following the recent launch of a full Proton workspace and privacy-first AI chatbot (Lumo), the product ecosystem is growing rapidly. So, instead of building a web browser from scratch, the community is begging the company to fix existing bugs and deliver long-promised features to its current lineup. "Proton needs to stop spreading resources and concentrate on core services," wrote one frustrated user. Another added: "How about a good working calendar?" Whether Proton pushes forward with its Chromium browser or listens to its community's pleas for app updates remains to be seen. For now, the company is keeping its cards close to its chest.

Proton is moving out of Switzerland. The world's safest privacy haven just cracked. For twenty years, "based in Switzerland" has been the strongest three words a privacy company could put on its homepage. Strong data protection law, outside the EU, outside the Five Eyes intelligence-sharing arrangement, famously indifferent to foreign subpoenas. It is the reason a generation of encrypted email and VPN services set up shop there. That reputation just took a serious hit. Proton - the company behind Proton Mail and Proton VPN, and probably the best-known privacy brand in the world - announced it is moving most of its physical infrastructure out of Switzerland. Not because business is bad. Because of a law that hasn't even been finalized yet. The short version * Proton is relocating most of its physical infrastructure out of Switzerland, starting with its Lumo AI product, which moves to Germany. * The trigger is a proposed revision of Switzerland's surveillance ordinance (VÜPF / OSCPT) that would require ID verification, six months of IP logs, and the ability to decrypt data on request. * The ordinance has not been finalized - the Swiss Federal Council has yet to decide. * The lesson for users: where a VPN is legally based, and what its government can compel, matters as much as the marketing on the website. What Switzerland is proposing. The law in question is a revision of Switzerland's ordinance on the surveillance of post and telecommunications - known by its Swiss abbreviations VÜPF, or OSCPT in French. It was introduced by the Swiss Federal Council and has been fought over by the country's technology sector ever since. What makes it alarming isn't one clause. It's the combination of three: * Mandatory identification - providers would have to verify who users are, using something like an ID document or a phone number. Anonymous sign-up effectively ends. * Data retention - providers, reportedly including services with as few as 5,000 users, would have to log IP addresses and keep them for six months. * Decryption on demand - providers would need the ability to decrypt data they themselves encrypted, when ordered to. That is a backdoor by another name. Each requirement on its own would be contentious. Together they describe a country where a privacy service is structurally impossible to run - which is precisely the argument the industry has been making. Worth being precise about This ordinance is not yet in force. As of mid-2026 the Swiss Federal Council had not finalized it, and the outcome is still genuinely uncertain. Proton is not reacting to a law that passed - it is reacting to the risk that it might, which tells you how seriously the industry takes it. What Proton actually did. Proton said it is moving most of its physical infrastructure out of Switzerland, citing the legal uncertainty around proposals it describes as an attempt to introduce mass surveillance. Its first product to move is Lumo, the company's AI assistant, whose infrastructure is relocating to Germany. The scale is the striking part. Proton framed the shift as an investment of more than €100 million into the EU, tied to building what it calls a sovereign "EuroStack" - European infrastructure for European services - with further facilities planned in Norway. Companies do not casually relocate that much infrastructure. They do it when they believe the alternative is worse. Proton's founder has argued publicly that the proposed rules would be illegal in both the EU and the United States, and has put the stakes in blunt terms: under the revision, the company says it would end up less confidential than the big American platforms people switch to Proton to avoid. Why this matters even if you've never used Proton. Most VPN marketing is a competition over feature lists - server counts, protocol names, streaming unblocks. This story is a reminder that the feature list is the easy part. The hard part is the legal environment a company operates in, because that determines what it can be forced to do regardless of what its privacy policy says. A no-logs policy is a promise about what a company chooses to store. A retention law is a rule about what it must store. When the two conflict, the law wins. That is the entire reason jurisdiction is worth caring about - and why a service quietly moving servers across a border is bigger news than another 10% off sale. The pattern across 2026 Switzerland is not an isolated case. The UK has debated restricting VPN access for under-18s, Australia now expects platforms to detect and block VPN use, and age-verification rules keep spreading. Different countries, same underlying instinct: treat the privacy tool as the problem. Where SoloFlight stands. SoloFlight'll be straightforward, because that's the whole point of an article like this. SoloFlight runs a strict zero-logs policy: SoloFlight do not store your browsing activity, connection timestamps, or originating IP addresses. Signing up needs an email address and nothing else - no government ID, no phone number, no face scan. Payments run through Stripe, so SoloFlight never see your card number. The honest version of the argument isn't "we are legally invincible." No provider anywhere can promise that. It's that the less a service collects, the less exists to hand over - under any government, under any future law. Data you never stored cannot be retained, leaked, subpoenaed, or sold. If you're re-evaluating your VPN after this week's news, the useful questions are in its guide to judging a VPN in 2026. And if you want the short version - encryption that doesn't depend on price, and a company that never asked who you are - that's below. Privacy that doesn't ask who you are. Every plan includes every feature. No tiers, no upsells, no renewal price hikes.