S

Suno

Text-to-song AI music generation platform

Staff Software Engineer / Senior Software Engineer - Platform Teams

Full-TimeUpdated on 10/1/2026
$229k - $363.5k/yr+ Equity package + 3% 401(k) employer match
Senior
Boston, MA, USA
In PersonThe role is based in Cambridge, Massachusetts (Boston) and requires working from the office five days per week.

About the job

Requirements
  • 5–7+ years of infrastructure, backend, or systems engineering experience.
  • Experience building and operating systems at significant scale in production.
  • Strong understanding of distributed systems, cloud services such as Amazon Web Services and Google Cloud Platform, and modern infrastructure patterns.
  • Expertise in infrastructure and platform security best practices.
  • Ability to reason through scaling, reliability, and performance problems with clear technical judgment.
  • Experience building internal systems from zero to one, such as authentication, notifications, or content delivery networks.
  • Experience with WebSockets, streaming traffic patterns, and audio/video delivery.
  • Familiarity with backend application programming interface design patterns at scale for internal backend, web, and mobile clients.
  • Experience on a platform or developer experience team whose primary customers were other engineers.
  • Ability to manage system migrations involving multiple dependent engineering teams.
  • Working knowledge of artificial intelligence for software engineering, including models, agents, coding assistants, and agentic workflows.
  • Experience building or operating agent orchestration, tool calling, or streaming large language model generation systems.
  • Experience building a streaming or realtime protocol in production, such as streaming generation, chat or turn-based user interfaces, or live progress feeds.
  • Experience shipping application programming interfaces consumed by iOS and Android clients in production.
  • Observability practices that instrument systems before launch.
  • Mentorship experience actively developing junior or mid-level engineers.
  • Strong product judgment to synthesize user needs and build the right abstraction.
  • Comfort operating in ambiguous, fast-moving problem spaces.
  • High ownership of projects from initiation through completion without waiting for direction.
  • Strong communication skills to keep stakeholders informed and reduce ambiguity.
  • Strong written communication skills for rolling out tools that change how people work.
  • Strong on-call instincts to triage, debug, and resolve incidents across a distributed stack.
  • Applicants must be eligible to work in the United States.
Responsibilities
  • Build platforms that engineers depend on to ship products quickly and safely, including application programming interfaces, authentication, deployment tooling, and backend-driven configuration.
  • Manage migrations that help teams transition from legacy systems seamlessly and without risk.
  • Collaborate with engineering teams across the company to understand their needs and build appropriate abstractions.
  • Build shared infrastructure, agentic tooling, and workflows that enable artificial-intelligence-native development across the company.
  • Define best practices, frameworks, and evaluation systems for how the company uses tooling in daily work.
  • Partner with engineering and non-engineering teams to understand their needs and build appropriate solutions.
  • Architect and build services to handle write-heavy consumer traffic and data.
  • Design systems that are performant, secure, scalable, and easy to observe.
  • Build and operate distributed databases, caching layers, and storage systems at consumer scale.
  • Scale Kubernetes infrastructure and control planes to support rapid product and machine-learning growth.
  • Design inference infrastructure that keeps artificial intelligence workloads fast, reliable, and cost-efficient.
  • Build foundational infrastructure for next-generation song creation, including a multimodal music agent, a creation platform powering multiple song-creation products, and a realtime application programming interface for live generation and radio experiences.
  • Operate with ambiguity by scoping what matters, moving quickly, and driving projects forward independently.
  • Own systems end-to-end from design through deployment, monitoring, and operational excellence.
  • Mentor other engineers and raise the bar for engineering quality, reliability, and maintainability.

About the company

Suno creates AI-generated music from text prompts. It lets users describe a mood, genre, or idea and automatically produces fully produced songs with vocals, instrumentation, and arrangements, without requiring any musical training. The product works by turning user prompts into complete songs using generative AI models, offering a library of styles from pop and rock to ambient and cinematic. What sets Suno apart is its combination of engineering and songwriting culture, a fast-growing platform that supports many musical styles and a broad global user base, and its emphasis on making music creation accessible to non-musicians while delivering a complete song output rather than isolated elements. The company aims to reshape how songs are conceived, produced, and shared and to help more people create music by lowering technical barriers and enabling rapid, iterative experimentation.

Company Size

201-500

Company Stage

Series D

Total Funding

$775M

Headquarters

Cambridge, Massachusetts

Founded

2022

Get referred to Suno

See people who can refer or advise you

Simplify Jobs

Simplify's Take

What believers are saying

  • Warner settled in November 2025, converting litigation into a licensed revenue relationship.
  • September 2026 launches improved prompt control and cut regeneration needs for creators.
  • Suno claims hundreds of millions in annual revenue and a $5.4 billion valuation.

What critics are saying

  • Sony and UMG filed a September 18, 2026 lawsuit over 60,202 recordings.
  • The complaint seeks up to $9 billion and an injunction blocking Suno's models.
  • If judges reject fair use, Suno loses its core training moat and faces shutdown.

What makes Suno unique

  • Suno's v6, launched September 9, 2026, pairs licensed catalogues with community preference signals.
  • It ships stem separation, inline editing, and real-time collaboration inside one web app.
  • Warner, BMG, and Believe partnerships give Suno distribution and legitimacy competitors lack.

Help us improve and share your feedback! Did you find this helpful?

Benefits

Health Insurance

Dental Insurance

Vision Insurance

401(k) Retirement Plan

401(k) Company Match

Generous Commuter Benefit

Unlimited Paid Time Off

Growth & Insights and Company News

Headcount

6 month growth

↓ -4%

1 year growth

↓ -2%

2 year growth

↑ 16%
Apple Scoop
Sep 28th, 2026
Sony and Universal sue Suno again: 'model laundering' explained.

Sony and Universal sue Suno again: 'model laundering' explained. 100% reliable Narration temporarily unavailable On this page7 sections At a glance * Sony Music and Universal Music Group filed a new lawsuit against AI music app Suno, saying its licensed v6 model is still built on stolen music * The labels call v6 "the fruit of the same poisoned tree" because it learned from outputs of Suno's older, unlicensed models * Warner Music, BMG and Believe have licensed their catalogs to Suno, leaving Sony and UMG as the big holdouts The fight over AI-generated music has a new chapter. On September 18, Sony Music Entertainment and Universal Music Group filed a second lawsuit against Suno, the popular AI app that turns text prompts into songs. The labels argue that Suno's new, partly licensed v6 model is still tainted by the copyrighted music used to train its earlier versions. Here is what the case is about and why it matters for AI. The background. In June 2024, the three major labels, Sony, Universal and Warner, sued Suno for training its AI on their recordings without permission. Since then, Warner Music Group, BMG and Believe have signed licensing deals with Suno, and their catalogs helped power the v6 models Suno launched in September. Suno said its older models, trained on unlicensed data, would no longer be supported. Sony and Universal did not sign. The new lawsuit: "model laundering" The new 45-page complaint, filed in federal court in Massachusetts, targets v6 directly. Suno has acknowledged that v6 learned partly from its community's creations, which were made with the earlier models. The labels argue that means v6 inherits the infringement, calling it "the fruit of the same poisoned tree." Commentators have dubbed this idea model laundering: using an unlicensed model's outputs to train a new model that appears clean. For the first time, the labels put a number on the recordings they say Suno copied: 60,202, which they call only a small portion of the total. They are asking for statutory damages, attorneys' fees and a declaration that Suno infringed. Photo via Suno // Suno's "Make any song you can imagine" artwork. The labels say its newest model still depends on unlicensed music. Suno's response. A Suno spokesperson called the claims fundamentally flawed on both the facts and the law. Suno says v6 was trained on content licensed from its partners, signals from its community and its team's accumulated learnings, and that using an artist's name pulls general musical qualities rather than letting users imitate someone's work. Suno has previously admitted scraping publicly available sources such as YouTube, but argued its early training was fair use. Get the Apple Scoop. The latest Apple news, leaks, and wallpapers - once a month, no spam. Computers & Electronics Apple Scoop respect your privacy and won't share your email. A wider war over AI music. Suno faces other suits too. Independent publisher Round Hill Music sued it for $1 billion last month, and Americana singer Jason Isbell is leading a proposed class action over outputs based on artists' identities. Universal has been especially aggressive, suing Anthropic and the distributor DistroKid, which it accuses of feeding an AI-slop pipeline. At the same time, UMG has licensed its music to AI companies that keep outputs inside their own platforms, including Suno rival Udio and AI remix features on Spotify. What it means for listeners and creators. For people using Suno today, nothing changes immediately. The app keeps working while the case proceeds, which could take years. But creators who publish Suno-generated tracks commercially should watch closely, because a ruling against v6 could affect how songs made with it can be used. Streaming services are also tightening rules on AI music, with several now labeling or limiting fully AI-generated tracks to protect human artists and royalty pools. Free wallpaper downloads Why it matters. The case tests a question that goes far beyond music: can an AI company clean up an unlicensed model by retraining on its outputs? If the labels win, AI developers across text, images and video could face similar claims about models built on earlier, unlicensed ones. If Suno wins, licensing deals may matter less than many rights holders hope. Universal is also fighting AI companies outside music. Read about the Anthropic IPO, one of the AI firms UMG has sued. Its take: "model laundering" is a clever legal theory, and if it sticks, it could reshape how every AI company thinks about training data. Sony and Universal are betting they can hold out for better terms than Warner got. End of story Keep following what matters. Continue with reporting selected around this story, join the conversation, or share it with someone who should see it. Reported by Yash Writer Yash's writing for Apple Scoop spans iPhone manufacturing, Mac hardware and the software that connects Apple's devices. The coverage includes Apple silicon comparisons, subscription pricing and wallpaper collections for iPhone, Mac and Android. Computers & Electronics Selected by the editors. More reporting around this story Apple Scoop Published 27th September, 2026 at 6:00 pm · Independent Apple reporting since 2020. iPhone case designs

JMAC Web, LLC
Sep 26th, 2026
Suno, Sony, UMG face renewed AI music copyright scrutiny.

Suno, Sony, UMG face renewed AI music copyright scrutiny. Labels sue Suno over model training and copyright, underscoring ongoing tensions between AI-generated music and rights regimes. The Verge reports a fresh wave of litigation between Suno, Sony, and Universal Music Group over copyright concerns tied to AI-generated music. The case underscores a regulatory and jurisprudential uncertainty about how training data, model outputs, and licensing interact in the AI music space. For developers and platforms, the takeaway is clear: rights holders are vigilant, and compliance tooling - clear licensing pathways, robust provenance, and traceable data sources - will soon be non-negotiable requirements for building and deploying AI-driven music services. For the broader AI industry, this is a reminder that model scale and novelty must be balanced with a credible approach to attribution, licensing, and user trust. Companies will increasingly need governance frameworks to manage ambiguous inputs and outputs and to reconcile creative ownership with algorithmic generation. The outcome of such cases will reverberate through product strategies that embed music in apps, streaming services, and game development. Heidi is JMAC Web's AI news curator, turning trusted industry sources into concise, practical briefings for technology leaders and builders.

Elite IT Business Solutions LLC
Sep 25th, 2026
Sony and UMG are suing Suno again.

Sony and UMG are suing Suno again. by bleffel | Sep 25, 2026 Sony and Universal Music Group filed yet another suit against Suno. The labels claim its new v6 model still infringes on their copyrights because it's trained on user outputs from previous models, which were themselves trained on unlicensed music ripped from YouTube and other sources. Sony and UMG are notable holdouts who did not sign a licensing agreement with Suno. In its complaint shared with The Verge, Sony and UMG accuse Suno of "model laundering," saying: "Training a 'new' model on the outputs of an infringing model does not eliminate the infringement; it launders it, passing the value of Plaintiffs' expression from the copied reco... This post was originally published on this site

CryptoCity
Sep 25th, 2026
Music labels file new copyright infringement lawsuit against AI music platform.

Music labels file new copyright infringement lawsuit against AI music platform. Major music corporations Sony Music Entertainment and Universal Music Group have initiated another legal challenge against AI music generator Suno, alleging continued copyright infringement. Sep 25, 2026 - 0 views Discover more Track Market Trends Explore AI Tools Compare Exchange Rates The artificial intelligence music generation platform Suno is once again facing legal action from prominent music companies, with Sony Music Entertainment and Universal Music Group (UMG) filing a new lawsuit. The companies contend that Suno's most recent iteration, referred to as its v6 model, continues to violate their intellectual property rights. Allegations of training data issues. At the heart of the dispute are claims regarding the training methodologies employed by Suno. The music labels assert that the v6 model's development leveraged outputs generated by earlier versions of the AI. These preceding models, according to the lawsuit, were allegedly trained using copyrighted musical works obtained without proper authorization. The plaintiffs specifically point to content

The AI Chronicle
Sep 25th, 2026
Suno lawsuit: Sony & UMG sue over AI music copyright.

Suno lawsuit: Sony & UMG sue over AI music copyright. The latest chapter in the high-stakes legal battle between major music labels and AI music platforms has begun! Sony and Universal Music Group have escalated their fight, filing another lawsuit against AI music generator Suno. TL;DR (too long; didn't read). * Sony Music and Universal Music Group have filed a new lawsuit against AI music generator Suno. * The labels allege Suno's v6 model infringes copyrights by being trained on user outputs from previous models. * These previous models were reportedly trained on unlicensed music ripped from platforms like YouTube. * The lawsuit highlights the growing legal challenges around AI music generation and copyright infringement in the generative AI industry. The latest chapter in the Suno lawsuit. Major music labels Sony Music and Universal Music Group have once again targeted Suno, the innovative generative AI music platform, with a new lawsuit. This ongoing legal challenge, commonly referred to as the Suno lawsuit, alleges that Suno's recently launched v6 model continues to infringe on their valuable copyrights. The core of the new complaint revolves around the claim that Suno's v6 was trained on user outputs from its previous models, which themselves were allegedly built using vast amounts of unlicensed music "ripped" from platforms like YouTube and other unauthorized sources. The rapid advancement of AI music generation technology has brought forth unprecedented legal complexities, particularly concerning copyright infringement. Platforms like Suno can create original-sounding music based on patterns learned from immense datasets. However, the origin and licensing of these training datasets are at the heart of the current Suno lawsuit. Music labels argue that using copyrighted material without explicit permission, even for "training" an AI, constitutes a violation of their intellectual property rights. The legal landscape is still evolving, trying to define what constitutes "fair use" in the context of AI learning and creation. Music labels' stance: protecting intellectual property. Sony Music and Universal Music Group have been prominent and vocal holdouts in the burgeoning world of generative AI music. Unlike some other labels that have explored licensing agreements with AI companies, Sony and UMG have adopted a more aggressive stance, prioritizing the protection of their extensive catalogs and the rights of their artists. Their repeated actions in the Suno lawsuit signal a firm commitment to establishing legal precedents that safeguard human creativity in the digital age. They contend that allowing AI models to freely exploit copyrighted works undermines the value of music and the livelihoods of creators. The "unlicensed music" Argument and Suno v6. The plaintiffs assert that Suno's initial models were trained on a massive scale of "unlicensed music," directly infringing on their copyrights. The current lawsuit extends this argument, claiming that because the v6 model was trained on outputs generated by these earlier, allegedly infringing models, the new version inherently carries forward the same legal liabilities. This nuance adds a layer of complexity to the music copyright infringement debate, questioning whether an AI model's derivative training data can still be considered infringing even if it's "AI-generated" rather than directly "human-created." The outcome of this specific point could have significant implications for how AI models are developed and iterated upon in the future. The broader implications for generative AI. The ongoing Suno lawsuit is not just about one company; it's a bellwether for the entire generative AI industry. These cases highlight the urgent need for clearer legal frameworks and industry standards regarding the use of copyrighted material in AI training. The outcomes could dictate how AI developers source their data, potentially leading to more robust licensing mechanisms or, conversely, stifling innovation if legal hurdles become insurmountable. This debate touches upon fundamental questions about originality, authorship, and compensation in an era where machines can produce creative works. The future of AI Music and licensing. The future of AI music creation hinges on finding a balance between technological innovation and respecting creators' rights. Solutions might involve industry-wide licensing agreements that allow AI companies to access copyrighted material transparently and fairly, or perhaps new legislative measures specifically tailored to artificial intelligence and artistic works. The AI music copyright debate is far from over, with each lawsuit adding another layer to the complex legal and ethical considerations surrounding these powerful new tools. The Suno lawsuit is a pivotal moment, shaping the legal landscape for generative AI music and setting precedents for how intellectual property will be protected in the AI era. What are your thoughts on this evolving legal landscape and the future of AI-generated music? Random article. Its mission. The AI Chronicle slice through the noise to bring you the latest breakthroughs, in-depth analyses, and thought-provoking discussions on everything from machine learning and neural networks to robotics and AI ethics. Popular tags.